Friday, October 12, 2018

M8.4 Chemical Policy Reform

The background paper I have chosen to read is "Give the Public and Workers the Full Right-to-Know and Participate." The paper talks about how the public has the right-to-know because they are the ones who are constantly exposed to toxic chemicals through the air, water, land, food,  and consumer products in every setting of their lives. I agree with the paper that if there is full disclosure of toxic chemicals, there will be more meaningful discussions about policy changes. In order to have persuasive policy briefs, relevant data is essential to convince those who are in power to make changes. The paper also stated that advocating right-to-know helps people communicate simple ideas to overcome polluters' money and influence. Polluters' may have the power now through their money and influence, but that power and influence can be shifted onto the public if they are given the information about the toxic chemicals they are exposed to. By knowing the harms, the public will be able to make informed decisions, and if a whole mass of people does not support companies that have toxic chemicals in their products, those companies lose money and eventually their influences. Supporting the right-to-know can lead to industries put human health first rather than profits. 

2 comments:

  1. Hi,
    I totally agree with you on your stance. If the public knew, they'd act. Certainly some just don't mind but those are the few. The only way things will change is by power of numbers. Dan

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Sandy,
    I support the right-to-know as well. It seems like a big part of the issue is people not knowing what they're getting exposed to, so an initiative like that can greatly affect the health of many.

    ReplyDelete

Final Blog

In the beginning, I was not looking forward to this class because I took environmental health as an undergraduate for my major and I did not...